Kadlec Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237005501
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Richland, WA, US
Phone
509-942-2661
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,017,521
Expenses
$2,174,302
Assets
$40,205,550
Liabilities
$4,766,370

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • LACEY PERRY (CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OFF. (PART YEAR)): $214,544 total reported compensation
  • MOLLY CALHOUN (TRUSTEE): $186,033 total reported compensation
  • JAMES HALL (CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OFF. - THRU 1/24): $183,586 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide safe, compassionate care.

What it reported doing in 2024

See schedule o.in 2024, the kadlec foundation's program service accomplishments included: - 170 in- and out-patients accessed assistance for hotel stays and fuel vouchers through our good samaritan fund, assisting with travel needs directly related to care, for a combined total of $8,729.- $52,420 benefited the population health program, supported by the kadlec foundation, which provides direct assistance to the unhoused and members of the latino community. This includes 322 individuals assisted by the range community clinic, a mobile unit providing health care to underserved communities. Another 613 were helped through a program at the mid-columbia library, a free service that connects people with the community resources they need. Another 781 individuals received resource connections, outside of the library program, and 518 unhoused individuals received assistance through the kadlec's homeroom connect program, which provides monthly meals, clothes, haircuts and health services. Support to population health also including emergent items for individuals, including warming kits, cooling kits, hygiene kits, durable medical equipment, care seats, grab bars, lifesaving medication, transportation and a lift battery. The kadlec foundation furnished kadlec primary care clinics with 265 blood pressure cuffs for patients who need to self-monitor and cannot purchase one.- the kadlec foundation awarded scholarships to 25 students at columbia basin college, totaling $52,290 and scholarships to 20 students at wsu-tri cities, totaling $41,904 for a total of $94,194 for 45 students pursuing health care careers.- 8,280 people were part of the healthy ages programs, including attending monthly wellness classes, a medicare class, assistance with medicare open enrollment, mall walkers, end of life classes and direct consultations.- the first community wellness con s.a.b.o.r classes were held in december 2024 with 56 participants - sabor means flavor and represents health, access, dance, opportunity and repair. Community members participate in a free zumba class to promote movement, while organizations present resources and programs available to the community.- 61 high school students attended a one-week introduction to medical fields to help fill future health care roles.- more than 1,200 books were donated by community members for patients in kadlec's nicu to support family bonding and increase speech/language interactions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.9%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.49; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $215K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 176 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.