Kachemak Bay Recovery Connection

Overview

Mission

Support for people in recovery kachemak bay recovery connection is organized exclusively for charitable, religious and educational purposes including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code. The overriding purpose of the corporation is support for individuals in recovery from substance use disorders. No part of the net earnings of kachemak bay recovery connection shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to members, trustees, officers, or other private persons, except that the corporation shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of the purposes set forth in the purpose clause hereof.

Operating model

Revenue model

Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.

Distribution model

Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

• Financial Efficiency: 18
• Transparency & Controls: 82
• Sustainability: 13
• Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Details

• Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 11.7% of spending went to programs
• Governance: Filed governance answers
• Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
• Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
• Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
• Schedules: 2 filed schedules
• Contacts: How to reach this organization
• Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
• People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

• High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
• High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
• High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
• High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
• High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
• Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.