Justin Bartlett Animal Resuce Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454828513
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5612488148
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,996,860
- Expenses
- $3,744,389
- Assets
- $814,160
- Liabilities
- $40,789
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Peter Torres (President CEO)
- Donald Wulff (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Peter Torres (President CEO): $62,805 total reported compensation
- Donald Wulff (Vice President): $35,163 total reported compensation
- Janet Diamond (Director): $20,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To Protect Improve the lives of abused, abandoned, and homeless pets and to placethem in loving permanent homes. In addition, the organization aims to provide lowcost medical care options and education on pet health to the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
To protect improve the lives of abused, abandoned and homeless pets and to place them in loving permanent homes. In addition, the organization aims to provide low cost medical care options and education on pet health to the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.2% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $63K · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $25K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX ConferencesMeetings column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.