Justice & Peace Office Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
591787037
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Apopka, FL, USA
Phone
4078890100
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$456,718
Expenses
$546,905
Assets
$1,640,243
Liabilities
$24,498

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See form 990, page 1, part i, line 1.

What it reported doing in 2012

Kids in motion (kim) - jpo provides a unique after-school academicenrichment program to at-risk disadvantaged children ages 5-12 in thecentral Florida area (112 children currently enrolled). Kim helpsstudents achieve and maintain a 2.0 grade point average or better whileincreasing their reading, writing, and mathematics performance by onewhole letter grade or more; children receive 15 weekly hours ofacademic instruction, tutoring, and guided parental support; kim alsointroduces children to positive social activities, and provides aunique educational environment of hope and encouragement for lifetimelearning; additionally, parents receive classes in english language acquisition, parenting, family literacy, nurturing families, and financial literacy. Jpo also provides a young leaders club focused on middle school and high school students from the same at-risk population. This program meets once a week in order to develop character and leadership skills. Currently twenty (20) students are participanting in this program.additionally, jpo has a theatre production company, second glance theatre (sgt), focused to provide university of central Florida theatre arts students, seniors and masters level graduate students, an experiential education opportunity in running a theater production company. Second glance theatre has been devloped to give voice to young authors and composers. Sgt providers these authors and composers the opportunity to hear their perform aloud and gathercritical feedback about their works. Sgt also workshops published but seldom performed published works. Sgt also produces three or four shows cast with students for the public. Lastly, sgt provide workshop training in theater to the kim program students and the adults of apopka in order to enhance their education and experience with theater.finally, jpo provides an adult education division for the greater apopka population offering life skills and life enhancement courses as a method to improve their knowledge and the quality of their lives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.7%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $458K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.