Just Horizons Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260750389
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Boston, MA, United States
Phone
(857) 254-4400
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,399,365
Expenses
$1,243,507
Assets
$1,308,980
Liabilities
$458,981

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CATHERINE CALDWELL-HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
  • WESLEY J WILDMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/TRESURER/SECRETARY)

Highest reported compensation

  • GEORGE HODULIK (CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER): $111,432 total reported compensation
  • SUZANNE WOOLSTON BOSSERT (CHAIR): $24,000 total reported compensation
  • WESLEY J WILDMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/TRESURER/SECRETARY): $10,062 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Just Horizons Alliance is a nonprofit research and innovation platform that equips people and institutions to lead with clarity, courage, and compassion in moving humanity towards a more just and hopeful future. The Center for Mind and Culture** (CMAC) combines behavioral science, simulation modeling, and systems thinking to help leaders see how complex challenges unfold—and design responses that align with human values. From health equity to conflict prevention, our research turns insight into impact. DigEthix** empowers technologists and decision-makers with tools, training, and real-time guidance to build AI and digital systems responsibly. We bring ethical foresight into the design process, ensuring that the tools and frameworks that shape our future are grounded in care, integrity, and equity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Just horizons alliance (jha) delivers program services that integrate research, innovation, and practical tools to ensure human dignity remains at the center of how we design systems, shape policy, and build the future. Our work spans computational modeling, ai ethics, and values-driven publishing, all aimed at equipping leaders with the insight and foresight needed to navigate complex social, technological, and cultural challenges. From developing responsible ai frameworks to simulating human systems and amplifying voices that explore the ethical, cultural, and spiritual dimensions of emerging challenges, our programs turn deep expertise into actionable solutions that support a more just, human-centered future.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.4%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 65.9%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 66.4% of revenue deployed · 65.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $819K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.