Just Enduring Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 845178047
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- St Charles, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3143914119
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,008
- Expenses
- $28,931
- Assets
- $116,819
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BENJAMIN GILLHAM (PRESIDENT/TR)
People named in this filing
- BENJAMIN GILLHAM (PRESIDENT/TR)
- MARTHA MCGEEHON (VICE PRESIDE)
- LARA GILLHAM (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Just enduring offers free resources to parents, families, friends and caregivers who have to endure the loss of a child.
What it reported doing in 2024
I. During the 24-25 fiscal year, the organization continued partnerships with hospitals and funeral homes in the st. Louis, mo and cleveland, oh areas. Ii. Offered resources during the di de los muertos celebration at the Missouri history museum and the annual pedal the cause event that raises funds for cancer research and treatment. Iii. 81 parent like you applicants had the opportunity to connect with other bereaved parents to share in their grief journeys based on similar losses. Iv. 638 step-by-step guides were given to families and caregivers and 673 sibling guides were distributed to parents with surviving children. V. 131 pamphlets and 867 resource cards were provided to families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.7%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 53.4%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.04; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.7% of revenue deployed · 53.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.