Just Boxing Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844026389
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Hawthorne, CA, USA
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,784
Expenses
$3,881
Assets
$2,382

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SEAN C FITZGERALD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SEAN C FITZGERALD (PRESIDENT)
  • SHENANDOAH R BRETTELL (DIRECTOR)
  • JORDAN STEWART (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Just boxing foundation inc. Is dedicated to supporting past and empowering future generations of boxers. The foundation provides grants scholarships and equipment donations to boxers in the following categories: amateur boxers - assisting with travel and expenses related to national qualifying tournaments and or international competition. Student boxers - awarding scholarships to college students enrolled in boxing courses student club programs or who compete as an amateur or professional. Professional boxers - providing financial relief to boxers unable to compete due to extraordinary circumstances or unexpected tragedy. Retired boxers - supporting past generations of boxers with injury addiction and or financial hardship.

What it reported doing in 2023

Boxing-la grant provided to us olympic team trials qualifiers that reside in counties served by USA boxing southern California association lbc33. A total of 7 qualifiers received a grant of $350 each.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 84% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -33.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.