Junior Service League of Moore County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561573770
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Cameron, NC, USA
Phone
5868793212
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,952
Expenses
$24,930
Assets
$118,372
Liabilities
$1,588

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lindsay Mason (Past President)
  • Staci Cross (President)
  • Molly Warner (President Elect)

People named in this filing

  • Lindsay Mason (Past President)
  • Staci Cross (President)
  • Molly Warner (President Elect)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Junior League of Moore County is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training. JLMC trains members for community service and civic leadership and provides direct volunteer support and charitable resources to youth, families, and underserved residents of Moore County, NC, in areas including food security, foster care support, domestic violence recovery, youth enrichment, and access to education.

What it reported doing in 2025

JLMC provided direct volunteer service and charitable resources to youth, families, and underserved residents of Moore County, NC, in partnership with North Moore High School, the Moore County Department of Social Services, and Friend to Friend. Activities included holiday gift and Angel Tree programs, a DSS Foster Care holiday party, school snack pantry and hygiene supply restocking, career fair and prom support, domestic violence recovery move out baskets, quarterly community street clean ups, and a Free Little Library and literacy access initiative. These programs directly addressed food security, foster care support, domestic violence recovery, and youth enrichment needs identified through JLMC's community assessment process.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.2%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 53%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.5%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.75; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.2% of revenue deployed · 53% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.