Junior League of Oklahoma City Oklahoma Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 736040128
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4058435668
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $743,668
- Expenses
- $712,881
- Assets
- $4,964,168
- Liabilities
- $181,418
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLI HILGENFELD PORTER (PRESIDENT)
- KRISTIN VAN NORT (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- SARAH MILLER (FINANCE VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANASTASIA SVEC (FUNDRAISING VICE PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY LUCAS (COMMUNITY VICE PRESIDENT)
- BREANN HAGER-MILLER (MEMBERSHIP VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KELLI HILGENFELD PORTER (PRESIDENT)
- KRISTIN VAN NORT (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- SARAH MILLER (FINANCE VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The junior league of Oklahoma city, Oklahoma, incorporated, is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mistletoe market: mistletoe market, held in the fall of each year, is a three-day holiday shopping extravaganza featuring merchandise from more than 100 vendors. The trained volunteers of jloc, under the direction of the mistletoe market committee, coordinate mistletoe market. Each provisional member works at least three hours at the event with the general membership as additional volunteers for the event. More than 2,000 volunteer hours are spent organizing all phases of this event. All proceeds from mistletoe market are used in supporting the focus area of health & wellness, our community projects and membership development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.96; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.1% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $499K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.