Junior League of Jackson County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237052840
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Medford, OR, USA
Phone
5419419056
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,503
Expenses
$98,302
Assets
$63,764

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANDRA COLLEY (President)
  • KARA LEEVER (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • SANDRA COLLEY (President)
  • KARA LEEVER (Vice President)
  • JENNIFER ULLMAN (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Education of the women and children of jackson county

What it reported doing in 2022

Providing food and school supplies to at risk and needy children of jackson county. Discreetly providing backpacks full of food and school supplies, in cooperation with the staff at Washington, talent, and phoenix elementary schools. Students at each location may pick up a full backpack on friday and leave an empty one on monday. No student is ever asked why they need the pack, this provides a non-threatening way for any student to receive help without drawing undue attention or teasing from fellow students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.5%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.