Junior League of Albuquerque Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 856009687
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5052600199
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,197
- Expenses
- $57,628
- Assets
- $686,401
- Liabilities
- $1,462
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE MCMULLAN (PRESIDENT)
- NATALIA GRIFFIN (PRESIDENT-EL)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE MCMULLAN (PRESIDENT)
- NATALIA GRIFFIN (PRESIDENT-EL)
- TORY WITT (EXEC VICE PR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The junior league of albuquerque is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.
What it reported doing in 2023
Junior league of albuquerque (jla) members contributed over 4,970 hours of volunteer service to the community through jla assignments. Jla's diaper bank collected 21,195 diapers and distributed 24,882 diapers, on-boarded 10 new community partners, obtained proclamations recognizing national diaper need awareness week from the governor of New Mexico and the mayor of albuquerque, and received a 5,000 grant for the diaper bank.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 56.6%; rating input score 57
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.91; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 56.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.