Junior Auxiliary of Greenwood Ms Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
646037616
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Greenwood, MS, USA
Phone
6624536423
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,841
Expenses
$37,627
Assets
$218,854
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MADELINE KIRK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHELBY BARRET (OFFICER)
  • ABBY BRANCH (OFFICER)
  • SARAK KAY DAVIDSON (OFFICER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose is to provide for the betterment of the children in the leflore and carroll county area.

What it reported doing in 2024

R.e.a.d. (renewing education, activating development) is a literacy program that focuses on encouraging reading and literacy opportunities through multiple avenues. - 1,891 pals (providing aid, lending support) was adopted in 2008 to establish an ongoing relationship with a family or families who need support to help break the cycle of dependency. - 1,000 s.t.a.r.s. (studying together and revealing smiles) is a biblical mentoring program that aims to enhance the self-esteem of 5th grade girls and encourage the application of christian ideals to their everyday life. - 389 crown club is a service organization for 10th and 11th grade girls from leflore county. - (9,203) pediatric connection partners with the greenwood leflore hospital to host the annual child safety fair held each fall, providing educational and fun activities for all on the hospital lawn. - 1,509 care aims to meet the needs of area organizations including the boys and girls club of leflore county, artplace Mississippi and special blessings of the Mississippi delta. - 1,301 feed the delta serves the food corps and the community food pantry through mini service projects. Further assisting the community food pantry, members volunteer twice a month, helping stuff boxes of canned foods for distribution of their monthly food supply 3,276 provisional project - the provisional members of the organization select a provisional project from year to year. The provisional project for this year was "feel teh farm", a children's touch and feel experience with farm equipment, games, and sensory bins durring a community event. - 405

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 55.1%; rating input score 55
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.6%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.82; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30% of revenue deployed · 55.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.