Junior Achievement North

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411424988
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6512550055
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
International Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,766,093
Expenses
$8,914,977
Assets
$28,089,080
Liabilities
$325,540

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

70 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SARA DZIUK (CEO & PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SARA DZIUK (CEO & PRESIDENT): $470,607 total reported compensation
  • JOLENE HART (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $234,488 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER KMECIK (VP OF PROGRAMS): $163,492 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Experiential learning programming: experiential learning programs bring learning to life for students. These programs are centered on a learning laboratory experience that provides a tangible way for students to apply what they have learned in the classroom while onsite in the junior achievement learning labs. Experiential learning programs include ja biztown and ja finance park with in-person and virtual delivery models.ja biztown - elementary and middle school students are not old enough to drive, work, vote or be a ceo. But that doesn't stop them from operating banks, managing restaurants, writing checks, and voting for mayor at ja biztown. The program combines in-class learning with a day-long visit to this fully interactive simulated lab. Ja biztown helps students connect the dots between what they learn in school and the real world. Through daily lessons, interactive activities, and participation in this simulated community designed to support differentiated learning styles, students develop a strong understanding of the relationship between what they learn in school and their successful participation in an economy and community.ja finance park - students practice planning for a successful future during this learning simulation that covers critical personal finance concepts and career exploration. Ja finance park is designed to be taught to middle school and high school students by classroom teachers. At the culmination of this program, students visit ja finance park in a virtual simulation or an on-site day to put into practice what they have learned about economic options and the principles of budgeting. Assisted by their teachers and a staff of trained volunteers, students explore budgeting and how educational and financial decisions can impact their future.we meet students where they're at. We utilize virtual content to meet the continual needs of remote learning opportunities, which means students who couldn't before receive classroom programming or make it to our learning labs now have access to those experiences, including virtual volunteer videos, ja biztown online adventures, and ja finance park virtual.we meet students where they're at. The virtual innovations we started developing in 2020 will remain part of our ongoing programming so we can continue to reach a broader group of students within the region. We have leveraged virtual content to meet the continual needs of remote learning opportunities, which means students who couldn't before receive classroom programming or make it to our learning labs now have access to those experiences, including virtual volunteer videos, ja biztown online adventures, and ja finance park virtual.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, 11% for grants, and 9% for affiliated organizations.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 75.5%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.15; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 75.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 60 of 60 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $471K · 70 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.