Junction City Tiger Auction Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921152631
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Junction City, OR, USA
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,197
- Expenses
- $127,281
- Assets
- $9,445
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LESLIE MCNAMAR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LESLIE MCNAMAR (PRESIDENT)
- KAIT WINKELMAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- BIANCA SPRINGER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To financially support school athletics and student clubs at juction city high school.
What it reported doing in 2024
In february 2025, junction city tiger auction inc. Held a single auction that raised money for junction city high school. These funds were distributed to the school for use in the 2025/26 school year. These funds will be used for the upcoming 2025/2026 school year. The funds distributed from the auction held in february 2024 were used in the following way, in accordance with our non-profit purpose. -new uniforms, practice gear, and supplies for several sports. -travel expenses for state playoffs and tournaments for several sports and clubs. -to send students to a skills USA competition, music competitions for band and choir, and a meccha conference. -new wrestling mats. -a state-of-the-art sound system for the gymnasium. -stadium rental lights for nighttime soccer games. -student spirit shirts and travel t-shirts for various clubs. -team logo canopies for teams. -replacement signage throughout the school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $119K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.