Jumpstart for Young Children Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043262046
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6175425867
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,330,093
- Expenses
- $17,370,057
- Assets
- $10,812,517
- Liabilities
- $2,975,188
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRYSTAL ROUNTREE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- JENNIFER TEMPLEMAN (PRESIDENT & COO (UNTIL 10/2024))
Highest reported compensation
- CRYSTAL ROUNTREE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $381,798 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER TEMPLEMAN (PRESIDENT & COO (UNTIL 10/2024)): $324,171 total reported compensation
- KATE WARREN BARNES (HEAD OF MA STRATEGY & PARTNERSHIPS): $199,145 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o: jumpstart envisions the day when every child in america enters kindergarten prepared to succeed. Through partnerships with higher education institutions and early care and education programs, jumpstart provides language, literacy, and social-emotional direct service programming utilizing an evidence-backed curriculum for preschool children from underserved communities; workforce programming to expand the pipeline of qualified, diverse talent pursuing careers in early education; and policy advocacy to support the early education sector and promote high quality learning for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o: direct service programmingto realize its vision of kindergarten readiness, jumpstart engages and trains college student volunteers, known as corps members, to deliver an intentional oral language curriculum to preschool children in underserved communities. By adding trained adults to preschool classrooms, jumpstart provides more individualized interactions with children and enriches the overall language environment in classrooms. Delivery of jumpstart's curriculum is based on the following key principles: (1) utilize culturally competent, developmentally appropriate practices; (2) engage children in playful learning experiences; (3) balance adult-led and child-initiated learning; (4) hold high expectations for all children; and (5) support children's development in an environment where they feel safe, valued, respected, seen, and heard. Typically, teams of four to six jumpstart corps members serve in one preschool classroom throughout the school year, developing the language, literacy, and social-emotional skills of their partner children. Teams of corps members conduct two-hour "jumpstart sessions" twice per week with their full partner class. Corps members typically serve 2-5 hours of additional individual classroom service (ics) per week, implementing individualized activities with children and supporting teacher-led activities. Jumpstart sessions have a consistent routine so children know what to expect and what to do, which is important for developing self-regulation skills. Sessions are a blend of large and small group learning experiences and independent play. To start, corps members introduce children to the message, themes, and vocabulary of that day's session. A small group shared reading experience helps children develop an understanding of vocabulary and content knowledge and begin to comprehend connections between characters' mental states and their behavior. Reading is followed by a large group learning time centered around an interactive activity that builds children's conceptual knowledge and content vocabulary. Next, in center time, children make choices, experiment, practice new or previously learned skills, and play; corps members engage children in conversations and activities that support oral language and social-emotional development. Finally, each session closes with an opportunity for children to share about the day's activities with their peers. Child and member impactin 2024-25, jumpstart had 2,108 corps members who delivered its evidence-based programming to 7,532 children in 13 states plus Washington, dc. Corps members reduce the child to adult ratio in every jumpstart classroom, allowing children to receive an individualized learning experience that helps them to develop nurturing relationships with caring adults. On average, a majority of jumpstart children make gains over the course of the program year in language and literacy skills determined to be predictors of kindergarten readiness and school success. Through the delivery of programming to children, jumpstart is also expanding the pipeline of qualified, diverse talent pursuing careers in early education. As reported on the 2022 corps member survey, 86% of corps members expressed interest in a career or higher degree related to their jumpstart service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.2%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.2% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $382K · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $606K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 40 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.