Jumpseed Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932803377
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Stone Ridge, NY, USA
Phone
6464899001
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Intergroup, Race Relations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,526
Expenses
$6,747
Assets
$19,779
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANLORI GOLDMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KATHERINE FRANKE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JANLORI GOLDMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KATHERINE FRANKE (PRESIDENT)
  • CHERYL WILKINS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To operate as a non-profit retreat center that provides a refuge for artists, activists, and cultural workers to recharge and sow new ideas in a rural setting just two hours from New York city. Jumpseed will operate as a sanctuary and gathering place for individuals or small groups to engage in strategic thinking, writing, and other reflective and creative projects. To serve as a space for local community groups to hold retreats, celebrations, and other events.

What it reported doing in 2023

To create an environment that provides support for the work and healing of artists, activists, and cultural workers, particularly those who are directly impacted by forms of structural injustice. All individual and small-group residences will be free to participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 74.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.93; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.