Jumoke Behavioral Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813804879
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4103669801
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Personal Social Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$294,112
Expenses
$554,972
Assets
$1,479,471
Liabilities
$790,488

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DERRYCK HOLSTON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DERRYCK HOLSTON (PRESIDENT)
  • SHAKIA BANKS (DIRECTOR)
  • VERNELLE MITCHELL-HAWKINS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Jumoke behavioral services, inc is prepared to offer in the form of one to one support services to the Maryland's most challenged youth in the baltimore metropolitan region. The youth impact program at jumoke behavioral services is a high intensity program designed to help youth who are on the verge of losing their current residential placement keep and maintain or improve their least restrictive residential placement. The primary focus of this program will be to assist youth with overcoming trauma and adversity that they are use to in their lives through varied therapeutic process and strategies that focus on skill building onsite in-home support services. The primary goal of the program will be to equip each youth with the coping skills to manage trauma and move to self sufficiency/ sustainability. Jumoke's youth impact program is prepared to work with 7-12 youth at a time who bcdss, bcdjs or dhmh has determined are in need of these high intensity youth support services.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization was approached by the state of Maryland to provide one-to-one services to troubled youth with the purpose of keeping them within the state and provide the least restrictive placement. The focus of the program is to equip each youth with the coping skills to manage trauma and move to self sufficiency and sustainability. The program had three youths during the year, with the capacity of twelve. Clinical supervision is provided to the youth and they are licensed by developmental disabilities administration (dda).

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.9%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 53%; rating input score 53
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -88.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.67; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.9% of revenue deployed · 53% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $294K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.