Julia F Thompson Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760594258
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Missouri City, TX, USA
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,523
- Expenses
- $196,051
- Assets
- $415,456
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Laura Collins (President)
- Jessica Hill (First Vice President)
- Saki Indakwa (Second Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Chelsea Ball (Director)
- Vanese Berry (Director)
- Tamoka Bellard (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide charitable support to enhance the quality of life for individuals and families in Fort Bend County and the Greater Houston Metropolitan area through leadership mentoring education economic development and health and wellness initiatives.
What it reported doing in 2024
EDUCATION. The organization supports programs and initiatives that promote academic excellence for all students empowering them to reach their full potential and prepare for success as responsible ethical creative and compassionate global citizens. Our efforts include providing scholarships to local students supporting schools and educators and responding to education-related community needs. Scholarships were awarded to 37 students pursuing higher education at colleges and universities across the United States.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $131K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.