Andrus

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
132793295
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Yonkers, NY, US
Phone
(914) 965-3700
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,658,027
Expenses
$39,974,841
Assets
$70,053,146
Liabilities
$8,652,150

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CORINE LURRY-MABIN (PRESIDENT & CEO (eff. 1/17/25))
  • HEATH I BLOCH (former president & ceo)

Highest reported compensation

  • LYNETTE GARCIA (VP & CHIEF ADMIN OFFICER): $283,481 total reported compensation
  • CORINE LURRY-MABIN (PRESIDENT & CEO (eff. 1/17/25)): $271,912 total reported compensation
  • HEATH I BLOCH (former president & ceo): $252,262 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide mental health, educational, and family support services to children, families, and adults in Westchester County, New York.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community division - the community division provides a range of health-promoting, school readiness, parent education, and family support programs and served clients in westchester, the bronx, and upper manhattan. The programs collaborate with public schools, childcare centers, clinics, the department of social services and other local institutions. Our community program consists of home visiting, care coordination services, community-based therapy and family support. - healthy families New York (hfny) provides home visiting services to families beginning prenatally, or at birth, through age five to promote parent-child attachment with the goals of supporting positive parent-child bonding and relationships, fostering optimal child and family health, development, and safety, enhancing family self-sufficiency, and preventing child abuse and neglect. Hfny served 122 children and families last year. - andrus parenting services (aps), formerly called therapeutic and parent aide services (tapas), is a mandated, preventive-service program that provides support to families who have been the subject of child abuse allegations or identified for preventive services by the local department of social services. Aps seeks to keep families together and promote safety, utilizing a trauma-informed lens. Aps served 65 families. - care management (cm) provides care coordination services to children who have complex health issues enrolled in medicaid or medicaid managed care to promote health and improve quality of life. Cm served 366 children. - children and family treatment support services (cftss) provides community and home-based therapy and supports for children under age 21 in need of mental health and/or substance use disorder treatment. The children and youth are enrolled in medicaid or medicaid managed care. Cftss campus-based served 60 children. - the community health access to addiction & mental healthcare project (champ) is a New York state program created to help individuals and families resolve issues they may face in accessing substance use disorder and mental health services. Champ served 78 families. Each program is grounded in the principle that quality care requires collaboration among all the relevant stakeholders. Thus, each program draws on the input and resources of family members and community leaders, as well as support from private and public funds.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.3%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 97.3% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $34.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $283K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.