Judeo Christian Health Clinic
Legal name: Judeo Christian Health Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591605647
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8138703231
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,220,975
- Expenses
- $1,053,070
- Assets
- $4,244,069
- Liabilities
- $423
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYLVIA D CAMPBELL MD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY HALL (EXECUTIVE DI): $118,727 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
| Picture | _"In the belief that we should do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God, The Judeo Christian Health Clinic provides free, quality, timely and compassionate health care to medically indigent residents of the Tampa Bay area who have no other resources for their health care needs."_ The Clinic began in 1972 to serve the needs of those who are uninsured and who cannot afford to see a doctor privately. Reverend Jim Holmes, our founder, began the Clinic with the hopes of providing access to quality and compassionate healthcare. Clinic patients do not qualify for government funded program like the Hillsborough County Healthcare Program, Medicaid or Medicare. |.
What it reported doing in 2024
The clinic was formed to provide health care to all who are unable to pay for such care. The clinic operates a free medical clinic, lab for the medically indigent, patient assistance, and a pharmacy in providing such health care. The clinic recorded 34,363 patient encounters during the year. 7,783 of these encounters were medical patient visits and 25,597 of these encounters were filled prescriptions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.03; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $931K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $119K · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.