Judaism By Choice
Legal name: Judaism by Choice Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203986436
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Beverly Hills, CA, United States
- Phone
- (888) 539-2924
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $281,499
- Expenses
- $264,364
- Assets
- $69,865
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- RABBI NEAL WEINBERG (DIRECTOR): $186,492 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Judaism by Choice creates experiences where the richness of the Jewish heritage, religion and rituals can be learned along with discussion of the pertinent issues of becoming and being Jewish. Experiencing the joys of Jewish life! _Judaism by Choice_** creates experiences where the richness of the Jewish heritage, religion and rituals can be learned along with discussion of the pertinent issues of becoming and being Jewish. **_Judaism by Choice_ **provides the space (makom) where those who are considering conversion, have already converted and/or born Jewish can meet socially in a warm and welcoming environment. Learn all about our organization Judaism by Choice offers resources and services for those recently converted to Judaism, interested in conversion, and members of the Jewish community wishing to learn more about the Jewish religion, people and culture. Our Mission.
What it reported doing in 2025
Where the richness of the jewish heritage and reiligion can be learned along with the discussion of the pertinent issues of becoming and begin jewish
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 47% of revenue deployed · 50% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $132K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $186K · 1 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.