Jubilee Partners Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581281067
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Comer, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7066124627
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $511,402
- Expenses
- $482,220
- Assets
- $531,150
- Liabilities
- $93,269
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MATT HUSSEY (Director): $9,336 total reported compensation
- CAMILLE IGNACIO (Director): $7,002 total reported compensation
- BLAKE ORTMAN (Coordinator): $4,668 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a Christian service community formed to provide education and other services to refugees primarily from war torn countries.
What it reported doing in 2024
Refugee program for hospitality have welcomed people from many different regions, cultures, and languages. Most families that come to jubilee are refugees or asylum seekers, and some are victims of human trafficking or other crimes. All have left their homes amidst some experience of persecution or violence. At jubilee, these families find a safe place for recovery and healing and the opportunity to study english and connect with social services, legal resources, and medical care. We partner with agencies, shelters, and church congregations who refer families to us or who provide continued support to people after they leave jubilee. We have housing for five families at a time, who typically stay two to twelve months at a time. We provide 15 hours a week of english instructions and one-on-one tutoring. Children may attend local public schools, depending on their needs. Some families are in the process of seeking legal immigration status in the united states, and we work to connect these families with legal options availave to them. We also connect people with appropriate counseling and medical services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $196.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $412K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $9K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.