Jubilee House Community

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561252307
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Monroe, NC, USA
Phone
7042863382
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rural Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$698,454
Expenses
$679,060
Assets
$41,010
Liabilities
$452,198

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Daniel Earl Murdock (Volunteer Staff full-time / Board Member): $25,188 total reported compensation
  • Claudia Saballos (Volunteer Staff full-time / Vice-Chp Bd of Directors): $13,188 total reported compensation
  • Paul Mohally Renk (Volunteer Staff / Board Member): $13,188 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ministry to the poor by meeting human needs, promoting reconciliation, and by accompanying communities in their efforts to become self-sufficient, sustainable, democratic entities. Significant activities focus on sustainable development including in areas of public health, reconciliation and advocacy work, and educational opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Development Ministries - Sustainable Agriculture/Economic Development: participation in international production chain partnerships including direct subscription expansion through Farmer Shares, LLC (4,071 # coffee). Expanded to include a second coffee cooperative. Participating in rural infrastructure improvements including 82 aquaponics systems benefitting 125 people. Support for small business development. Aided organic sesame cooperative in its dissolution process due to external economic factors. Development Ministries - Health: Our full-time radiologist, part-time general physician, family physician, and volunteer doctors saw 2,119 patients. Our family planning program offered free, consistent birth control for 38 women. Our pregnant moms program attended 41 women; breastfeeding program attended 35 women; moms and toddlers program attended 95 women; and the asthma program attended 39 people. Our radiologist performed ultrasound exams on 143 patients with a point-of-care ultrasound machine. Our only paid nurse, with the help of volunteers and 4 interns, did 61 EKGs not to mention other care. Our nurse also did 460 wound care procedures, nebulization treatments, injected medicines, and put in IVs. Our half-time therapist saw 285 clients. Our laboratory completed 1,443 tests in the clinic; also glucose checks, and sent out 225 PAP tests to be read by a pathologist. Our half-time dentist and full-time hygienist saw 1,101 patients at the clinic along with good oral hygiene trainings at the local schools. We took four medical brigades to the remote coffee cooperative El Porvenir. Attended 2,772 patients in their homes using their first aid kits provided by the clinic, and accompanied 75 women for mammograms and six patients for other specialized treatments. Did 578 wound care sessions, gave 415 injections, tested 863 patients for glucose levels and took 1,197 blood pressures. And accompanied both visiting volunteers and our local doctors into 153 homes to treat patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most filed governance safeguards are in place. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 51
  • Accountability: 62
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 11.03; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.3% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $573K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $25K · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.