Joshua Way of Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873197499
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8133375008
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,944,554
- Expenses
- $1,758,094
- Assets
- $372,574
- Liabilities
- $8,634
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAYETRENIA NICHOLS (PRESIDENT)
- BYRON ROQUEMORE (DIRECTOR/CEO)
People named in this filing
- CELESTE JUDGE-JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- KAYETRENIA NICHOLS (PRESIDENT)
- JACQUELINE REYNOLDS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See sch o
What it reported doing in 2025
Life skills 360 training institute assisted 110 students in improving their social-emotional and behavioral self-regulation skills. This program is a comprehensive, evidence-based training program designed to equip students with practical skills, tools, and strategies to successfully navigate life's challenges. Some of the training topics include managing anger, social skills, self-esteem, decision-making, stress management, effective communication, assertiveness, and financial literacy. Grounded in a highly regarded prevention curriculum, the program combines engaging instruction with interactive exercises, role-playing scenarios, hands-on demonstrations, social-emitional learning activities and group discussions to support meaningful learning and real-world application. Through these experiences, particpants gain confidence, strengthen peer relationships, and develop self-regulation strategies that support long-term success at school, home, and in their communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 71.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 73.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 84.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.