Joshua Harvest Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201282192
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Pontiac, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2484997395
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $126,691
- Expenses
- $122,930
- Assets
- $285,541
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide human services to youth, individuals and families.
What it reported doing in 2011
Transition point: the joshua harvest ministries (jhm) transition point program works with aging out of foster care youth (aofc), recovering sustance abusers, returning citizens, persons infected with and/or affected by HIV/AIDS, abused women with children, and very low to moderate income individuals. Jhm provides permanent housing and supportive services to our clients in the areas of homeownership counseling and independent living skills. Direclty served 38 individuals and families. Indirectly served 52.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 95%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.32; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 101.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 148.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 153% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 95% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $117K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.