Jordan Theatre Co Booster Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851754400
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Fulshear, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2812349000
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,184
- Expenses
- $119,525
- Assets
- $44,914
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ASHLEE HURST (PRESIDENT)
- LAURA FLOOD (VICE PRESIDENT - MEMBERSHI)
- LAUREN ASHLEY (VICE PRESIDENT - TECHNOLOG)
- JENNIFER SHORTT (VICE PRESIDENT - PRODUCTIO)
- KIMBERLY MCKEAN (VICE PRESIDENT - VOLUNTEER)
People named in this filing
- ASHLEE HURST (PRESIDENT)
- NATALIE SANDBERG (TREASURER)
- LAURA FLOOD (VICE PRESIDENT - MEMBERSHI)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to support the students, parents, staff and teachers of the theatre program at jordan high school by recruiting volunteers, raising funds and conducting events.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supports the theatre department in putting on their spring show and theatre x (6 student written and directed plays). Booster club paid for all expenses. 131 students participated in cast and crew for the two productions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.