Jordan S Relay

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922427491
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Allentown, NJ, USA
Phone
9088903345
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,259
Expenses
$61,349
Assets
$55,052
Liabilities
$600

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Erica Haller (President, Executive Director)
  • Steven Day (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Erica Haller (President, Executive Director)
  • Steven Day (Vice President)
  • Patricia Day (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Jordan's Relay supports mental health awareness with a focus on youth ages 25 and under. The organization also provides research and support for parents of youth struggling with their mental health. They also fundraise to meet their support goals and give back to the community in an effort to bring awareness to mental health.

What it reported doing in 2025

Created youth mental health School Resource Kits to be distributed to New Jersey schools at no cost to recipients. Kits included information on accessible mental health resources, peer-to-peer suicide prevention programs, crisis support services, and other tools to help schools strengthen student mental health support systems and increase awareness of available resources. A total of 75 kits were distributed in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 54.4%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -60.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 118.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -75% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 54.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.