Jordan Crossing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465690895
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Plymouth, MN, USA
Phone
7633009129
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,730
Expenses
$335,777
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Wayne Peterson (President)
  • Steven Larson (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Wayne Peterson (President)
  • Steven Larson (Vice-President)
  • Jeffrey Thone (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission was to raise the necessary funds to build a residential hospice building by getting gifts from individual donors and/or grants from companies or foundations. A key partner in this venture withdrew its support this past year, so we have had to close the corporation and disburse the assets. This disbursement is listed both on Part 1, Line 10 and in Schedule N.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our remaining assets of $332,714 were disbursed to the following hospice ministries as follows: Grace Hospice (Minneapolis) 105,644 Quiet Oaks Hospice (St. Augusta) 105,644 Children's Health Care Foundation 60,713 Presbyterian Homes Foundation 60,713. These are also listed on Schedule N.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3,029.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.