Joplin Family Y
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 440552026
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Joplin, MO, USA
- Phone
- 4177819622
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,494,123
- Expenses
- $2,520,040
- Assets
- $6,913,786
- Liabilities
- $746,518
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL SANDERS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TYSON HAGALE (PRESIDENT)
- JUAN ESTRADA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL SANDERS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TYSON HAGALE (PRESIDENT)
- ERIN SLIFKA (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Under the guidance of christian principles, the joplin family y seeks to serve the community by providing an environment and activities that enable all people to achieve their full potential through the development of spirit, body and mind.
What it reported doing in 2025
Other programs include: fitness classes are taught by certified instructors, with group fitness classes providing community, accountability and guidance in how to properly perform the exercises. The result is lasting friendships and a workout routine that participants want to stick with. In aquacise classes, the buoyancy of the water supports participants while the resistance of the water challenges them, allowing them to increase endurance, range of motion and muscle strength, as well as flexibility, balance and cardiovascular health. Youth sports programs are offered that give children an opportunity to learn the fundamentals of sports, but more importantly, the importance of teamwork, sportsmanship, and a healthy lifestyle.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $50.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.74; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.