Joint Mission Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472633414
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,924
- Expenses
- $132,255
- Assets
- $6,064
- Liabilities
- $983
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHRYN T O'BRIEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KATHRYN T O'BRIEN (PRESIDENT)
- KYLE M CAPAROSA (SECRETARY, T)
- DORIS CALDWELL (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Joint missions primary purpose is to provide essential household items and furniture to formerly homeless u.s. Veterans so that they may begin the process of healing, finding a job, and living more comfortably in the home which the veterans administration has helped them to procure. Most of these veterans have nothing when they move into their new apartment no bed, linens, kitchenware, or cleaning supplies. The organization provides this service to veterans who have been vetted and referred by the veterans administration caseworkers in the hudvash program. The organization works closely with the hudvash case workers. The organization receives the household items and furnishings by reaching out to local businesses, and from individuals in the local community.
What it reported doing in 2016
Between january 28, 2016 and june 19, 2017 joint mission, inc. Furnished the homes of 220 u.s. Veterans referred to us by the veterans administration through their hudvash program. These veterans included women veterans with children who were sleeping on the floor. These families had absolutely no furniture or kitchenware in their apartments. Some veterans are physically disabled and we provided hospital beds, and furnishings that would allow them to more fully enjoy life in their new home. Local businesses and individuals in the community donate the household items which we pick up, store in our warehouse, and deliver to the veterans. Some of the items we provide to our veterans are: kitchen: dishes, flatware, glasses and cups, bowls, pots & pans , coffee pots dining room: tables, chairs bedroom: beds, dressers, side tables, lamps, bed linens, blankets bathroom: towels, shower curtains, rugs, soap dishes living room: sofa, loveseat, chairs, coffee tables, lamps, televisions, radios, side tables, pictures, mirrors, and other decorative items cleaning supplies: brooms, mops, vacuum cleaners office: when available, we have provided computers
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 53% of revenue deployed · 53.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.