Johnson County Community College Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237164614
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Overland Park, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9134693835
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,664,426
- Expenses
- $5,751,354
- Assets
- $53,789,981
- Liabilities
- $82,496
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFERY ALPERT (PRESIDENT)
- TIM MCKEE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARSHAUN BUTLER (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JOY GINSBURG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DR JUDY KORB (SECRETARY): $389,328 total reported compensation
- KATHERINE B ALLEN (VP CLG ADVANCEMENT & GOVT AFFAIRS): $192,780 total reported compensation
- JOY GINSBURG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $173,314 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To further the jccc mission, strategic goals and initiatives, the foundation will strive to provide access to the college for all students; advance excellence through the development of community leadership, business partnerships and financial support; and promote cultural activities to enrich the college and community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Academic program & project support: the healthcare simulation lab and annual symposium provides state of the art learning opportunities for students in healthcare professions and area professionals. International service projects are available for those in nursing, dental hygiene and early childhood education programs. Collaboration continues on the management of safingerstick which gives students a comfortable, high-quality, realistic blood draw and glucose testing experience while protecting a standardized patient's hand from puncture. The hospitality and culinary programs prepare students to become chefs in the chef apprenticeship program. Other areas of study include dietary management, pastry/baking, food and beverage and hotel and lodging management. The foundation is proud to support the mission of the student basic needs center at jccc, as well as the mealshare program. It is to provide information and resources to combat the hardships which adversely affect the ability of jccc students to complete their academic, professional, and personal development objectives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.35; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $389K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.