Johnson City Kiwanis Club Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812186830
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Johnson City, TN, USA
- Phone
- 4232824511
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,569
- Expenses
- $22,145
- Assets
- $12,809
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CODY PARSONS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CARL MCINTURFF (DIRECTOR)
- RICHARD MCGOWAN (DIRECTOR)
- SHANNON JONES (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation's goal is to support the kiwanis club of johnson city in assisting young people, particularly those who are economically challenged in attaining vocational excellence, to aid handicapped persons in regaining happy, useful lives through the expending of funds directly for such purposes or by the furnishing of funds to other organizations organized for charitable, scientific research, or educational purposes, or the prevention of cruelty to children; to provide and enhance facilities and programs to be used by and benefit young people and their families, to work with local governments, civic organizations and agencies to provide or assist in providing programs and projects to enhance the lives and wellbeing of persons of all ages, and to provide and enhance recreational and event opportunities to our region .
What it reported doing in 2023
Current year expenditures were used for grants to other agencies or projects directly benefiting needy children in teh johnson city community
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.