John P Kuder Childrens Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261757220
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Gulf Breeze, FL, USA
Phone
8505727122
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,259
Expenses
$50,731
Assets
$6,250
Liabilities
$51,159

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM H BARKER (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER KEMP (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • RENEE BOOKOUT (DIRECTOR)
  • KATHY DREADIN (DIRECTOR)
  • PAMELA AVERY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The john p. Kuder foundation is a 501(c) (3) founded in 2005 to care for, educate, and advocate for abandoned and orphaned children in urban andra pradesh, india. The foundation's program is a community-based model, engaging local service providers, school, healthcare providers, and neighborhoods for referral, consulting, and career development of graduates.john p. Kuder children's foundation, inc. Donates funds to mercy ministries to operate an ophange in india. Mercy ministries is a non-profit tax exempt entity established by rev. Chandra under the laws of the state of andhra padesh, india. Rev. Ravi chandra and his wife, prasanthi, serve as volunteer on-site directors of the orphanage. Rev chandra is also an ordained minsiter and has volunteered his services. Neither rev. Chandra, nor his wife, receive any compensation.

What it reported doing in 2015

To rescue abandoned and orphaned street children from a lifetime of prostitution, human trafficking, forced labor and homelessness; and to afford each child on an equal basis a complete education from pre-k through four years of college or trade school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.2%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.19; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.2% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.