John Bapst Memorial High School Foundat

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237073378
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Bangor, ME, USA
Phone
2079896400
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,914
Expenses
$256,633
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EARLE HANNIGAN (President)
  • LINDA HARNUM (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • EARLE HANNIGAN (President)
  • LINDA HARNUM (Vice President)
  • MICHAEL MEAGHER (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Foundation shall engage in such activities as are deemed necessary and appropriate in order to provide John Bapst Memorial High School with financial support, including, engaging in solicitations and other fundraising activities coordinated with and on behalf of John Bapst Memorial High School, acquiring real or personal property by devise, bequest, gift, donation or otherwise in accordance with policies to be adopted by the Board of Trustees, and holding and managing the proceeds from such fundraising activities, and assets otherwise acquired, for the benefit of John Bapst Memorial High School, and making distributions of income and/or principal of the Foundation to or for the benefit of John Bapst Memorial High School, at such times, in such amounts, and for such purposes as the Board of the Foundation shall from time to time determine.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -890.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -27.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -72.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $256K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.