Johanna a Favrot Fund

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 12 grants totaling $558,000. The stated grant purposes included the center for humane technology works to ensure that the most consequential technologies, particularly ai, serve humanity. its objectives are to build public awareness and agency around tech harms and to drive policy action by advising leaders, shaping incentives, and fostering accountability across the tech ecosystem. the purpose of the grant is to support staff capacity to launch two major initiatives: a global film campaign by academy award-winning directors to elevate public understanding of ai risks; and the uniquely human national campaign which highlights the needs to preserve human identity, purpose, and livelihood in the age of ai., college track helps to prepare underprivileged students for college, provides support for them while they are in college, and helps them navigate the job market on graduation. the purpose of the grant is to support college track oakland with $30,000 for general operating expenses and $10,000 for visits to colleges., and designed to serve men experiencing addiction, harvest farm provides no-cost residential rehabilitation for up to 72 men at a time. participants live on-site for 6-12 months, engaging in individualized recovery plans that include work readiness training, counseling, education, and life skills development - all with a healing rural environment. the purpose of the grant is to support a capital campaign to add 8 beds to the harvest farms facility north of fort collins; investment in meeting the requirement for expanded licensure with the state of colorado permitting greater access to state funds; and expansion of the clinical offerings of harvest farms either in-house or via partnerships., plus 9 other reported purposes.

Grant Deployment

• Grant deployment ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

• Grant expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

• Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

• Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
  • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
  • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
  • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
  • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
  • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
  • Payment to a government official: Pass
  • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
  • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
  • Excess business holdings: Pass
  • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
  • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
  • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
  • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
  • Grants to individuals: Pass
  • Grants to organizations: Pass
  • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
  • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
  • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
  • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
• Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

• Endowment-health comparison: 13.91; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings