Jobs Daughters International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941032874
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Anaheim, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7145354575
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $384,197
- Expenses
- $323,502
- Assets
- $680,367
- Liabilities
- $39,078
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DENISE LAFROMBOISE (GRAND SECRETARY): $22,000 total reported compensation
- ROBERT BOSWELL (GRAND TREASURER): $10,800 total reported compensation
- MICHELLE MILLER (GRAND GUARDIAN): $3,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To nbsp; unite nbsp; young nbsp; women nbsp; who nbsp; are nbsp; members nbsp; of nbsp; their nbsp; local nbsp; bethel nbsp; bethel nbsp; membership nbsp; enables nbsp; young nbsp; women nbsp; to nbsp; learn nbsp; leadership nbsp; skills nbsp; organizational nbsp; methods nbsp; and nbsp; the nbsp; importance nbsp; of nbsp; fulfilling nbsp; individual nbsp; responsibilities nbsp; within nbsp; a nbsp; group nbsp; membership nbsp; helps nbsp; to nbsp; develop nbsp; respect nbsp; and nbsp; loyalty nbsp; to nbsp; their nbsp; country nbsp; parents nbsp; guardians nbsp; and nbsp; other nbsp; members
What it reported doing in 2024
Grand bethel session is an annual convention for the purpose of selecting young women from local bethels to leadership positions in the statewide organization and promoting friendship and respect for other cultures and people while learning to be part of a team through competitions and a variety show.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.8%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.8% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $158K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $22K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.