Joblink of Maryland Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271525838
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4106028700
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,891
Expenses
$41,147
Assets
$3,753
Liabilities
$11,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EZRA FRIEDBERG (President)
  • MOSHE SPERO (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • CHANINA REISCHER (Secretary)
  • AVI BERNSTEIN (Treasurer)
  • EZRA FRIEDBERG (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To address a broad range of social challenges facing members of the community and to offer, initiate, manage and/or facilitate constructive community service projects in the fields of career training and placement, education, human services and social action including but not limited to day care, senior services, neighborhood preservation, youth outreach and leadership training, financial and other aid to refugees, immigrants and other community members, advocacy and other charitable needs.

What it reported doing in 2020

We placed 24 people in jobs and counseled about 179 others.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.1%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.2%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.93; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.1% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.