Jimaganish Wadokaged

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

8 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Provide community to support veterans their families and the local community.

Majority of revenue generated through the sale of food and beverages.

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.89; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $154K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
Consistency: 35 of 41 current checks pass · 6 findings to review
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX Advertising column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesProfFundraising column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX Insurance column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX OfficeExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.