Jim Meech Agri Med Crisis Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993471377
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Fort Scott, KS, USA
- Phone
- 6202243313
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,562
- Expenses
- $9,707
- Assets
- $64,897
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marita Meech (President)
- J W Meech (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Marita Meech (President)
- J W Meech (Vice President)
- Elizabeth Meech (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
(c) To provide support, financial or otherwise, for the rural communities andagri-workers of Kansas, including, but not limited to, Fort Scott, Kansas and its inhabitants; and(d) To provide aid and/or assistance to farmers/ranchers encountering a medical crisis. The foundation's goal is to give some monetary, physical, and/or other forms of assistance to agriculture community members in the early days of a medical crisis as may be deemed appropriate by the Board from time to time and on a case-by-case basis.
What it reported doing in 2025
EIN 99-341377(c) To provide support, financial or otherwise, for the rural communities and agri-workers of Kansas, including, but not limited to, Fort Scott, Kansas and its inhabitants; and(d) To provide aid and/or assistance to farmers/ranchers encountering a medical crisis. The foundation's goal is to give some monetary, physical, and/or other forms of assistance to agriculture community members in the early days of a medical crisis as may be deemed appropriate by the Board from time to time and on a case-by-case basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 16
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.5%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 33%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 83.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.69; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.5% of revenue deployed · 33% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.