Jib Productions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320209993
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Westport, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2032474083
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $5,412
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANA MULLER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DIANA MULLER (PRESIDENT)
- BEA CRUMBINE (TREASURER/SE)
- LORI SOCHOL (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Introducing new audiences to the performing arts
What it reported doing in 2025
The tax exempt purposes of jib productions inc are 1) identifying and producing staged readings and live theatrical presentations of classic plays as well as new plays by students and established playwrights. 2)introducing new audiences to performing arts through staged readings, dramatizations, lectures, dance recitals, film presentations, conversations between artists and audiences, and other productions. 3) introducing audiences to performing art presentations involving issues of cross-cultural, economic and social diversity 4) producing, presenting and sponsoring educational programs, seminars and conferences in connections with the foregoing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 10
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $531 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.