Jgb Mental Health and Mental Retardation Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201480790
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2127696200
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,107,805
Expenses
$1,886,742
Assets
$210,376
Liabilities
$34,418,188

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CALVIN W ROBERTS MD (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CALVIN W ROBERTS MD (PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,305,428 total reported compensation
  • PAUL D MISITI (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $554,703 total reported compensation
  • MAURA SWEENEY (CHIEF PROGRAM & SERVICE OFFICER): $512,008 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide exceptional services that inspire people who are visually impaired to attain their goals.

What it reported doing in 2024

Jgb mental health and mental retardation services inc.'s behavioral health services include several programs specifically designed for people with vision loss and other disabilities who benefit from behavioral health treatment programs. Each program is designated by New York state as vital access/safety net providers due to the number of medicaid patients we serve with extremely high needs. Manhattan psychiatric clinic is the only psychiatric clinic in the country offering treatment and management of behavioral disorders to people who are blind or visually impaired, at risk for vision loss, physically disabled, or have traumatic brain injury. Our clinic specializes in the treatment of depression and coping with chronic disease. Programs are specifically designed and adapted for people with depression, anxiety, and fear associated with sensory and functional loss. Our psychiatric services include individual, couple and family psychotherapy, psychiatric evaluation, psychopharmacology and medication management, group psychotherapy, and others. The clinic serves children and adults who are visually impaired, physically disabled, seriously and persistently mentally ill, developmentally disabled and traumatic brain injured. The clinic provided 7,430 sessions to 472 clients during the 7/1/2024 - 12/31/2024 short year period.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 163.6; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 70.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.