Jewish World Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471632745
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2021
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123029199
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $5,685
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ITAY KOREN (PRESIDENT)
- LAWRENCE FISH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- EDWARD J MURPHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ITAY KOREN (PRESIDENT)
- LAWRENCE FISH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GUY IRONI (SECRETARY & TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
An international educational organization fostering jewish identity in the modern world while combatting anti-semitism and strengthening ties between the jewish community and the non-jewish community through online outreach, educational speakers, campus activities, conferences and events.
What it reported doing in 2021
Information program - develop and utilize an ongoing jewish news and culture website. The activities of the website will include the development of articles on worldwide jewish news, news about israel, and articles about jewish culture. These articles will be posted to a dedicated website which will be updated daily, and they will be simultaneously posted social media.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -33.1% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.