Jewish Social Policy Action Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200460097
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Meadowbrook, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2159356668
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Liberties
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,438
- Expenses
- $1,453
- Assets
- $7,412
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alan Garfield (President)
People named in this filing
- Alan Garfield (President)
- Bruce Fishberg (Treasurer)
- Stewart Weintraub (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the organization is to research, inform and act: To promote the freedom of religion and separation of church and state under the First Amendment and state and local laws To protect the civil rights of Jews. other minorities, and the vulnerable in our society To secure for ourselves and society the benefits of Jewish learning and culture: and to support the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, repairing the world.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization writes amicus briefs on matters involving the separation of church and state and religious freedom. No costs are involved and the members of the board contribute their time for no fees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.1; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -27.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.