Jewish Republican Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822606166
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Westlake Village, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8056570654
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,936
- Expenses
- $34,122
- Assets
- $22,656
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRUCE KARASIK (President)
People named in this filing
- BRUCE KARASIK (President)
- MITCH SILBERMAN (Secretary)
- JUDITH KARASIK (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Founded in 2016, the Jewish Republican Alliance is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that unites and energizes politically conservative Jews, Christians and others who share a commitment to defending the interests of both America and Israel. Through our grassroots nationwide network of chapters, and our national, local and online events and programming, the Jewish Republican Alliance provides a platform for individuals to make their voices heard, stay informed, get involved and make a difference. In addition to building the Jewish Republican community into a digital force, the organization also works to unite its members into a communal force, activating them in a political force in support of conservative leaders and scholars. By fostering a sense of unity and purpose among its members, the Jewish Republican Alliance seeks to enhance the effectiveness of its advocacy efforts on...
What it reported doing in 2023
To meet monthly to inspire, collaborate and debate the causes and effects of current events, laws and regulations that affect communities and especially the Jewish communities and corroborate change.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 23
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.4%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 24.9%; rating input score 25
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 22.4% of revenue deployed · 24.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.