The New Jewish Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133500285
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
1-800-544-0304
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1
Expenses
$940
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Audrey S Weiner (President and CEO)
  • Nancy Stoddard (Vice President IT)

People named in this filing

  • Audrey S Weiner (President and CEO)
  • Elizabeth Grayer (Chair)
  • David Haas (Treasurer/Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services. Eight Over Eighty** showcases eight extraordinary individuals who personify the value of aging well into our 80s and beyond. We champion the importance of embracing life with meaningful intention, purpose, and an expectation of continued accomplishment. **Eight Over Eighty** was created to galvanize public attention while raising critical funds to support our mission. The 2026 Eight Over Eighty Gala** will take place on May 27, 2026 at the Ziegfeld Ballroom in NYC. 6:30 PM Cocktail Reception 7:30 PM Dinner & Program.

What it reported doing in 2015

To manage/operate financially distressed/operationally impaired healthcare/ housing organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -93,900%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -26.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.