Jewish Federation of Volusia & Flagler Counties Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591774958
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ormond Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3866720294
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,184,714
- Expenses
- $1,139,996
- Assets
- $9,107,678
- Liabilities
- $4,454
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARVIN MILLER (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL SZNAPSTAJLER (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- STUART AMOLS (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- STEVE UNATIN (PAST PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT LENNICK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT LENNICK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $107,097 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization serves three distinct missions which are a result of our philanthropic efforts: 1) to provide social services for families in need. 2) to provide school supplies to low income students. 3) to enhance jewish identity and education in the community through support for programs both locally and in israel.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided social services to the community in the form of food, case work, and direct financial aid to individuals and families consisting of food and referral service to other agencies. 19,886 people received ten days' worth of food including meat, fresh fruit and vegetables, juice, cereal, and pastries from the jerry doliner food bank. 79 jewish elderly, 80 years or older, and residents of assisted living or nursing homes were provided with gifts and lunches.1,032 families received holiday meal baskets for easter, thanksgiving, and christmas, and 162 children and tweens received 455 toys or gift cards for chanukah and christmas.individuals are provided assistance regardless of their religious affiliation. Ninety-eight percent of the people served were not of the jewish faith.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $31.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 49.1%; rating input score 49; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.2%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.99; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 26 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 29 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.