Jewish Federation of Greater Naples Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592151725
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Naples, FL, USA
- Phone
- 2392634505
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,313,583
- Expenses
- $4,271,013
- Assets
- $30,693,394
- Liabilities
- $1,446,395
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY FELD (CEO)
- NEHEMIA ICHILOV (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY FELD (CEO): $230,402 total reported compensation
- ALICIA FELDMAN (DEVELOPMENT): $137,925 total reported compensation
- NEHEMIA ICHILOV (CEO): $24,712 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Public fundraising, distribution to other charitable organizations, fill educational, humanitarian and social service needs of the jewish community and promote understanding and cooperation with the non-jewish community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Women's cultural alliance - the women's cultural alliance (wca) is an affinity group of the jewish federation of greater naples. The wca provides the opportunity to meet others who share similar interests in a wide variety of social programs. Membership is over 1500 women, men's cultural alliance - the men's cultural alliance (mca) is an affinity group of the male members of the jewish federation of greater naples (jfgn) whose purpose is to create friendship and camaraderie among its members by attending and participating in social, intellectual, sporting & athletic activities. Membership is over 700 men. Catholic-jewish dialogue of collier county - the purpose of the catholic- jewish dialogue is to engage jews and catholics in understanding their past history and advancing the cause of mutual understanding and appreciation of their differences, as well as their commonalities. Israel advocacy committee - the israel advocacy committee is made up of members of our jewish community. Several members have lived, worked, volunteered or studied in israel. The israel advocacy committee has adopted the following goals: to conduct symposiums, forums and seminars to monitor and respond appropriately to newspaper articles and editorials jewish community relations council (jcrc) - the jcrc's primary mission is to promote and enhance the excellent relations that the jewish community now has with the broader naples and collier county community. Jcrc outreach, both within the jewish and general communities, is intended to educate and inform by offering programs for the community on jewish issues and experiences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, 34% for grants, and 2% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.5%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.5%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 72.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.19; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.5% of revenue deployed · 70.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $230K · 30 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 34 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.