Jewish Family Services of WNC
Legal name: Jewish Family Services of Wnc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452497063
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Asheville, NC, United States
- Phone
- 828-253-2900
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,820,881
- Expenses
- $1,009,726
- Assets
- $979,906
- Liabilities
- $54,567
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID LEADER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL BARNETT (EXECUTIVE DI): $120,208 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Jewish Family Services of WNC (JFS) is an inclusive, welcoming space that provides a broad range of clinical and social support services to adults of all faiths — with special emphasis on the needs of older adults and other under-served community members. HomeAboutOur Vision Vision for the future The Strategic Planning Committee of Jewish Family Services of WNC (“JFS”) has updated its strategic plan grounded in the agency’s historical success and identified client needs. This plan is aligned with our mission statement:_Jewish Family Services of WNC (JFS) is an inclusive, welcoming space that provides a broad range of clinical and social support services to adults of all faiths – with special emphasis on the needs of older adults and other under-served community members._.
What it reported doing in 2025
Faye's place is a structured social program, a unique approach to senior care. It is not adult day care, a dementia group, or a senior center. Our team includes a program manager, a program coordinator, a professional cook, trained volunteers, and special engagement facilitators. We offer individual, respectful, and caring support. Caregivers will have peace of mind knowing loved ones are well-cared-for in a safe, welcoming, secure environment, allowing time for self-care and to pursue personal activities. We also offer confidential consultations with our case manager, who can provide resources for aging issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.4%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $73.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 48.4% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $878K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.