Jewish Family Service of the Desert

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330613083
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Palm Springs, CA, United States
Phone
(760) 325-4088
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,913,621
Expenses
$2,982,420
Assets
$2,495,559
Liabilities
$634,309

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MERI NIELSEN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KRAIG JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DI): $131,835 total reported compensation
  • JAMES MANALAD (DIR. FIN&ACC): $111,945 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

JFS is a nonsectarian provider of social services for all Coachella Valley residents. Our Mission To provide for the social service needs of the Jewish and general community throughout the greater Coachella Valley with a commitment to promote the well-being of people of all ages, incomes and lifestyles. Our Valley, Our Passion! Memorial tributes are a unique way to honor someone. When you make a memorial tribute your tax-deductible donation will help support the services of JFS. Your gift will also celebrate the life of your loved one by helping the JFS mission in a truly meaningful way. JFS will create and send your personal message in a tribute card. Other ways to support JFS.

What it reported doing in 2024

Jfs offers many additional programs that benefit coachella valley residents. For instance: jewish family service of the desert (jfs) is a nonsectarian provider of social services to coachella valley residents that offers several low- to no-cost services to help stabilize households, financially and mentally. Throughout the fiscal year, 17,132 services were provided to 4,045 unduplicated clients. Approximately 55% of clients identified as female, and 45% identified as male. Ethnicity and race demographics closely mirror the coachella valley's overall demographics. Approximately 92 agency volunteers provided 3,985 volunteer hours. The jfs auxiliary, a group of self-governed volunteers, successfully coordinated its annual fundraising event, "the aging brain," on sunday, november 17, 2024, at the indian wells country club. Author and lecturer, dr. Marc milstein, author of "the age-proof brain," offered helpful tips and lifestyle advice to help stave off the deleterious effects of aging, helping participants understand how to better retain their cognitive abilities. Proceeds from the event support the auxiliary's family giving circle and the jfs angel fund, used to provide emergency financial assistance to residents. Jfs helped coordinate the valley's first "healthy desert healthy you" environmental summit, september 20-21, at the westin mission hills resort. The event, sponsored by the desert healthcare district and foundation, provided updates on state, county, and regional efforts to improve soil, air, and water quality throughout the area. Through generous grants provided by the anderson children's foundation, bighorn cares, California department of social services, champions volunteer foundation, city of indian wells, city of indio, city of palm desert, coeta and donald barker foundation, houston family foundation, the morongo band of mission indians, and philanthropic givers, approximately 213,304 in funds were disbursed for emergency needs for those with low incomes. To help reduce incidences of fraud, disbursements were made directly to vendors for necessities such as overdue rent and utilities, food, and medications. A generous grant from the houston family foundation supported a collaboration between the mizell center, desert healthcare district & foundation (dhcdf), and jfs to offer in-person case management services at mizell once a week, maintain a list of currently available community resources available via the dhcdf website and jfs website with a link to the connect ie website for greater program information. The agency's mental health counseling program continued to partner with local agencies to provide no-cost, no-wait counseling services to partner agency clients and members of their households. During the year, jfs partnered with sixteen local agencies, and 897 no-cost counseling sessions were provided to their clients. Further, jfs offered 56,000 in clinical scholarships, making no-cost connections to therapists possible for those who were uninsured or unable to afford insurance copayments. Jfs case managers continued to help residents gain access to available benefits such as calfresh (food stamps), low income home energy assistance program (liheap), and medi-cal applications. During the fiscal year, 2,666 unduplicated clients were provided with 5662 services. Of the 2,666 clients, 667 were seniors 55+ years of age. Jfs case managers also provided supervision to two health career connection (hcc) interns during their 10-week preceptor programs, helping to inform future care providers about the needs facing many of our coachella valley neighbors. The case management program continues to oversee our engagement with the inland empire health plan (iehp) community supports program by offering housing navigation, housing tenancy, and housing deposit services to iehp clients, and our goal remains to expand that program to the extent possible. Jfs case managers are responsible for adjudicating requests for emergency

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 91.4%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 91.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.