Jewish Day School of the Lehigh Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222842807
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Allentown, PA, USA
Phone
610-437-0721
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$50,000
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARC BERSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARC BERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINA TOFF (ADMINISTRATI)
  • ARTHUR HOCHHAUSER (FINANCE VP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our vision is to inspire and educate our students to embrace Jewish values, excel academically, and contribute meaningfully to their communities, fostering a lifelong commitment to learning, leadership, and service. Support JDS today. _We are so appreciative of your generosity and support of our school and family._. _We are so appreciative of your generosity and support of our school and family._ GIVE NOW BE A PART OF SOMETHING _GREATER_. and _Values_ Our vision is to **inspire** and **educate** our students to embrace Jewish values, excel academically, and contribute meaningfully to their communities, fostering a lifelong commitment to learning, leadership, and service.

What it reported doing in 2024

To support the operations and education of the students at the jewish day school of the lehigh valley

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.6% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 1 of 1 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.